The Author's Journey and the Blogger's Journey
I am in New Orleans, ironically pretending to be an author in the traditional publishing-industry sense of the word. I am sitting in a seriously cliched writerly cafe, the Rue de la Course near the Tulane University campus. Jazz is playing in the background. Its the sort of coffee shop that conforms to your expectations of an archetypal artsy coffee shop so well, it is surreal. Like The Simpsons' idea of an artsy coffee shop.
If I grew an instant goatee, slapped a beret on my head and called myself a flâneur, (a self-descriptor preferred by a certain celebrated evil twin of mine), I'd be a perfect parody of a writer. A tres French writer at that. The only way I can continue sitting here (and I want to because it is actually a very nice place and the coffee is good) is to do so ironically.
Jokes aside, being in this coffee shop, doing what I am doing, got me to a serious breakthrough concerning the difference between being a blogger and being an author, a question I've been pondering ever since I started out on this road trip to promote Tempo nearly two weeks ago. Though I have now published a book, I view myself (and usually introduce myself/prefer to be introduced) as a blogger, not "author" or "writer." It isn't really about what medium you use or how you write. It is about how you view yourself. Author is a profession within the publishing industry. Blogger is a trade practiced by an individual. Professions and trades both wrap around a skilled craft and a specific way of seeing the world (the "art"), but there the similarities end. Blogger and Author are very different archetypes that lead to very different narratives. Specifically, Author leads to a standard redemption narrative, while Blogger leads to a life-as-performance-art narrative.
So here we go; my first serious and long post on this blog. And yes, it may be a bit confusingly self-referential for those who've read Tempo, since it i s a book about archetypes and narratives, but I am sure you'll be able to keep everything straight. If you haven't read the book, you should probably read this post first.
Authors versus Bloggers: Ten Differences
Consider the following interesting differences between archetypal authors and archetypal bloggers. By archetypal author I mean somebody with a book contract with a publishing company owned by somebody else, who receives royalties. Self-publishing does not count.
By archetypal blogger, I mean somebody who writes a blog blog and might self-publish a book, like me. I don't mean a news blog, product marketing blog, online journal or corporate blog. I am also ignoring for the moment the popular hybrid archetype: the blogger who looks for the traditional book deal as the gateway to authorly legitimacy, because I believe that is a temporary phenomenon, a result of people confusing two deeply distinct archetypes.
To make the comparison meaningful, consider authors and bloggers with respect to the same medium: the book (authors can write blogs, and bloggers can write books, so the medium is sort of irrelevant here).
If I grew an instant goatee, slapped a beret on my head and called myself a flâneur, (a self-descriptor preferred by a certain celebrated evil twin of mine), I'd be a perfect parody of a writer. A tres French writer at that. The only way I can continue sitting here (and I want to because it is actually a very nice place and the coffee is good) is to do so ironically.
Jokes aside, being in this coffee shop, doing what I am doing, got me to a serious breakthrough concerning the difference between being a blogger and being an author, a question I've been pondering ever since I started out on this road trip to promote Tempo nearly two weeks ago. Though I have now published a book, I view myself (and usually introduce myself/prefer to be introduced) as a blogger, not "author" or "writer." It isn't really about what medium you use or how you write. It is about how you view yourself. Author is a profession within the publishing industry. Blogger is a trade practiced by an individual. Professions and trades both wrap around a skilled craft and a specific way of seeing the world (the "art"), but there the similarities end. Blogger and Author are very different archetypes that lead to very different narratives. Specifically, Author leads to a standard redemption narrative, while Blogger leads to a life-as-performance-art narrative.
So here we go; my first serious and long post on this blog. And yes, it may be a bit confusingly self-referential for those who've read Tempo, since it i s a book about archetypes and narratives, but I am sure you'll be able to keep everything straight. If you haven't read the book, you should probably read this post first.
Authors versus Bloggers: Ten Differences
Consider the following interesting differences between archetypal authors and archetypal bloggers. By archetypal author I mean somebody with a book contract with a publishing company owned by somebody else, who receives royalties. Self-publishing does not count.
By archetypal blogger, I mean somebody who writes a blog blog and might self-publish a book, like me. I don't mean a news blog, product marketing blog, online journal or corporate blog. I am also ignoring for the moment the popular hybrid archetype: the blogger who looks for the traditional book deal as the gateway to authorly legitimacy, because I believe that is a temporary phenomenon, a result of people confusing two deeply distinct archetypes.
To make the comparison meaningful, consider authors and bloggers with respect to the same medium: the book (authors can write blogs, and bloggers can write books, so the medium is sort of irrelevant here).
- Authors (outside a few specific genres like books about marketing) affect an attitude of marketing being beneath them or a burden imposed on them by the money-minded publisher; bloggers fundamentally view marketing as an artistic (not merely pragmatic) necessity for their work to make aesthetic sense . *
- Authors are welcomed by the host at the front door; bloggers are directed by the butler to the delivery entrance, figuratively speaking.
- Authors do book tours with a small entourage in tow, fly first class and stay in nice hotels; this blogger at least is driving around alone in a beat-up old car, sleeping on readers' couches and raiding their refrigerators when feasible.**
- Authors autograph their books; I find myself getting somewhat befuddled whenever people ask me to autograph Tempo. It seems silly somehow. It isn't that sort of book.
- Authors delegate the sordid business of actually selling their book to a member of their entourage or the hosting bookstore/organization during book events; I have sold a couple of copies of my book out of the trunk of my car, and though I won't be doing much of that due to sales-tax messiness, I found it deeply satisfying to personally handle the exchange in a status-leveling sense.
- Authors sport an attitude of noblesse oblige towards their readers, and expect readers to come to them en masse in prestigious public venues; I find that I vastly prefer interacting with readers on their turf. Preferably 1:1 or in small groups in their homes. My writing is merely a conversation-starter, not a conversation-object.
- Authors are accorded, and expected to demonstrate, high status with respect to their readers. Aesthetically coherent blogging voices tend to exhibit either an equal or lower status with respect to the audience. A blogger who talks down to his/her audience may well grow a following, but their blogs somehow strike me as deeply ugly.
- Authors expect and enjoy ascriptive authority and cultural legitimacy for their work, but they need not be particularly reputable in terms of behavior. In fact getting up to disreputable things is almost expected of authors. By contrast, authority and cultural legitimacy don't really apply to bloggers, but reputation -- being known as standing for certain values and modeling certain behaviors -- matters a great deal.
- Authors expect their authority and cultural legitimacy to be based on critical judgment. Popular sentiment is mostly irrelevant. By contrast, blogging reputation is almost entirely a matter of popular sentiment.
- And perhaps most important: authors derive their cultural legitimacy from being published by someone else; the trade of blogging derives its cultural legitmacy from... well, I'll get to that at the end, I need some groundwork first.
9 Comments
Interesting sets of analogies. . . Trader is equivalent to my "label" of a bricoleur. Roughly translated, I carry around a set of bits and pieces that I creatively apply with my work. And it is like performance art because you need to keep performing for your work to be visible.
Thanks for sharing.
Laurie
p.s. sorry I missed you when you were in Troy, NY.
Nice.
This post reminded me of a hw assignment I had where I distinguished between a trade, profession, and craft within journalism, and I didn't see it at the time but after reading this post I dug it out and read it again, realizing the differences I make between the three rely on the motivation for writing a piece, and the way a piece is assimilated into society; whether a writer is under contract, or a freelancer, or trying to publish material to uphold standing ideals, manipulate an already popular standard, or make an expression of their identity without any preconceived intention.
I really like your idea of spiritual significance, and a spiritual talisman. It seems like a good metaphor to use in order to dig out the motif of really anything. Finding where a spiritual significance resides finds you a crux of a narrative.
One distinction I am surprised your didn't include though the hints of it are apparent throughout:
The book is a finished product while a blog is constantly evolving.
The fact that many (most?) self published books are done by people who maintain a blog is significant. The self published book has less of that romantic appeal because it is assumed to be shaped by the interaction with the audience. It isn't pure! It isn't solely the product of one isolated mind creating something perfect.
The traditional publishing business model feeds this perception. Everything must be perfect before it goes to print because the second edition might not arrive for years, if ever. By contrast, the blog is immediately editable, and I assume the self published book is somewhat more easily revised as well.
This thing seems quite deep to me. In fact, I think you've really nailed it.
That said, I wonder where I fit it? I'm a bit of an amateur writer who "publishes" by posting my stuff to websites. Folks read it and enjoy it. I get a fair number of responses. In fact, by my best estimates, over a thousand people read my last thing. (That's sort of a guess, but it did get well over 10,000 downloads.)
Anyhow, sure Random House won't be impressed, but I'm happy. I feel like there is a very small corner of the world where I matter.
Anyhow, a long time ago I realized that the publishing game was a bad bet for someone like me. I write pretty non-mainstream stuff. I'm unlikely to hit some mass-culture sweet-spot at just the right time -- such as pretty vampires or whatever. I doubt I'd ever make serious money. And frankly, the whole agent/publisher/rejection-letter game seems terribly unpleasant to me.
I'd rather give my dreams away than sell them cheap to those people.
All that said, I don't feel like a blogger (although I blog). I certainly buy into the "truth-seeker" thing. Well, at least, I take my writing very seriously and want to create deep and thoughtful stories (within the limits of my genre -- don't ask).
So, I don't know. I'm pretty sure that you're right about a lot though.
I have to disagree with your generalisation of self publishers, although I agree some are vanity publishing. But you miss some important points in your generalisation of authors too, as not all authors do books signings or autographs - this is especially true of those using pen names to stay hidden. Nor do all authors feel anything for their readers. Many published authors are well known for not liking their readers or welcoming them at places.
I think it's best to define authors as people who write books to be read at any time for relaxation or to be education, be they on academic subjects, reference works, or fiction. While bloggers are more like the editors pages or letters pages in a newspaper, as it's where people make personal comments on things, or the page where a reporter goes on about anything. Also, I think Vanity Publishers are those who write a book, print up copies at their own expense, and then proceed to give them away free or cheap. That's totally different to those who place a book at places like Lulu as a self publisher and then let people print them as they buy them. This has no expense by the author at all, while Vanity Publishing does.
You appear to totally ignore some other important facts, like most publishers not wanting unsolicited manuscripts unless they come via agents they approve of. These means authors having to pay agents, and an author having to be lucky to get their book in the door. It also means the print publishes often end up printing some horrid garbage. You also overlook people who did so well as self publishers that the print publishers chased them down and offered them huge sums to print their books.
I suspect you base your validation of legitimacy for authors as having gone through an external editorial selection process. If that's the case, where do you place e-publishers like Dpdotcom (www.dpdotcom.com) who accept unsolicited manuscripts but have an editorial panel that decides if they'll take a story or not? Also, where do you put people who self publish through people like Lulu (www.lulu.com) and are then approached by people from Amazon or Barnes & Noble to make their books available through them?
There's also the question of the many free web sites that carry stories from e-writers, places like Stories On Line (storiesonline.net), Fine Stories (finestories.com), and other web sites where you pay to access the stories.
Then you can add to the mix with authors who put a story up at a place like Fine Stories or Stories On Line as well as at Lulu, and have people buying print copies from Lulu to hand out to friends.
The writing industry is very different now, and I think your concepts of what self publishing means is decades out of date and still stuck in the days where self publishing meant getting a few hundred copies printed out at a Vanity Printing service and personally handing them. Toady a self publisher makes the story available to printers around the world to print as readers demand, and that's where the whole industry is going. There and e-books via things like Kindle, iPad, and the other e-book readers. Some mainstream publishing houses are already heading in this direction, check out Baen Books (www.baen.com) and how they now operate.
Regards,
Ernest
---
National Novel Writing Month winner 2009, 2010
Printed and downloaded copies of stories are available at:
http://stores.lulu.com/ernestbywater
http://finestories.com/auth/Ernest_Bywater
http://finestories.com/auth/Ernest_Edwards
http://storiesonline.net/auth/Ernest_Bywater
http://storiesonline.net/auth/Ernest_Edwards
http://www.dpdotcom.com/ebooks.htm
Ernest:
I think you cometely misunderstood my point. I was using a prototypical kind of 'author' in the public imagination as a basis for examining the Mythos surrounding the social role of 'author' in traditional publishing.
The intent was to partly satirize self-publishers' rather desperate attempts to seek legitimacy. I am self published myself, but I try not to let exactly the vast array of confusing (and largely irrelevant) facts cloud the psychology of what's going on.
This is a post about the psychology and perceptions (self and outside) of the calling of writing. It is not a post about the industry.
G'day,
Sorry, but that's NOT how it came across, as it didn't read like satire to me. It seemed to me to be very specific about a key part of the industry, while ignoring other aspects, and the serious changes taking place. I know a lot of self publishing authors are writing nothing but rubbish, but so are a lot of people who get their books published by the big print houses. Also, the sort of external verification and validation of a story's worth now comes from a lot sources, and the validation by a publisher's editor is only one of them. The greatest validation for story is when you put it aside for several weeks, and then give it another edit prior to sending it off to another person for editing and proof reading.
There are many Vanity Writers out there doing Vanity self publishing, but they are far out numbered by legitimate authors who can't get a toe in the main print publishing world as the editors and publishers aren't interested in doing business with anyone except the agents who are their friends. If my memory serves me right, I think Grisham had to self publish and self promote his first few books because the publishers weren't interested and the agents would touch him; no look at him. I don't claim to be another Grisham, but I get angry at being called a vain fool. I work hard to write what I write, and have improved my style and writing over the years.
I do most of writing on line as I do NOT have any access to the print publishers, nor do I have the money to pay the costs of organising an agent, I live in a rural area of New South Wales, Australia. Thus, my only means of getting to the market is on-line as a self publisher or via e-publishing of some sort. I use a number of electronic publishing options that include an e-publisher based in Ireland, and free story web site based in Canada. Through all of them, I have over two million words of fiction stories out there in over seventy stories; ranging from very short stories, through novellas, novels, and super novels.
Some of these would never interest the main publishing houses due to the content, some would. I do derive a small income from them, but some are put out as free as I know the content is not commercial, or the size isn't commercial (few places will take a story with 278,000 words in it), or a few other reasons. I get validation of the value of my work via many sources; the editor for those that go through the e-publisher and they accept, the downloads from the free sites - over half a million downloads all up at the moment, feedback from readers and other writers, and income sales from Lulu.
I do not seek legitimacy, as I already have it, and it annoys me that you appear to deny it. I know many other self publishing authors who are also at the same level. Many self publishing authors talk about sales or downloads, as that's the only measure they have in common; just the same way the print publishers talk about sales when advertising the second print run. how else would you try to have them measure their books against others. If I wrote a physics treatise, I'd expect to have a peer review from other physicists, but when I write a fiction story to entertain people, who is a valid peer to review it? Other authors, critics (most known for getting it wrong), or readers? How do you measure the readers? Only via sales or downloads if free and on-line.
Bloggers write to say what they think, authors write to say other things. Fiction authors write to be entertaining, and some of us include something in the story to be educational or thought provoking; to get a message across, but buried within the story. We have different intentions and different aims and different styles. We also have widely different audiences, and anyone who writes, aims their content at the intended audience; unless they wish to write drivel.
Sorry, but I see this blog as being well out of order, especially if it was meant to do what you say in the response. You missed the mark by a county or two. What you did say is much like what a lot of the editors say to justify their position of refusing to look at manuscripts that don't come through their favoured agents. That sort of bigotry gets my dander up.
Regards,
Ernest
Wow Ernest - You seem to have an axe to grind. You made your points. Now just let go!
G'day Laurie,
It's not so much as grinding an axe, but refusing to be spoken down to. I had made my point and have no intention of saying anything more, except as may be required in response to comments. As my second post was.
Ernest